Z8MB1E
055db8d0f0
Ultraworked with [Sisyphus](https://github.com/code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent) Co-authored-by: Sisyphus <clio-agent@sisyphuslabs.ai>
12 lines
3 KiB
Markdown
12 lines
3 KiB
Markdown
# Application TODOs
|
|
|
|
## Full Feature Additions, Top Priority
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Leadership evaluations and performance rating system** - Members of the unit should be able to rate the performance of their direct team leaders (full performance rating) and submit opinions on separate leaders (a more limited rating system for non-direct supervisors.) These ratings should appear anonymously on the leader's service record page. The ratings are divided by mission, so that they can accumulate over time to form a more accurate representation of the overall delta of a leader's performance over the course of multiple operations. These ratings appear as bars, red-to-green gradients, and percentage scores on the service record page. A small table showing the latest missions and the leader's overall rating are also visible below this bar. Additionally, leaders should be able to rate the performance of their subordinates. However, these ratings appear in a far more limited fashion on the subordinate's service record page. Instead of a breakdown with bars, percentages, latest missions, etc., they instead just get a text label indicating a summary of their performance from leadership. For example, if a subordinate is rated very highly by their leaders, their text label might say "OPERATOR PERFORMANCE LEVEL: EXCELLENT" in green text while a moderate review may say "OPERATOR PERFORMANCE LEVEL: MODERATE" in grey or blue text and a low rating might say "OPERATOR PERFORMANCE LEVEL: UNDER REVIEW" in red text. Preferably, there'd be at least 5 levels of performance instead of the 3 I used as examples.
|
|
- [ ] **Ribbon overview and listing page** - There should be a page that lists all of the medals and ribbons that could be granted to a user (excluding commendations, which could arise on the fly and are not set in stone.) This would allow users to review the requirements for earning a specific medal or ribbon, and get to see the art of that award as well, if any.
|
|
- [ ] **Editable helpdesk tickets & user voting** - Having helpdesk tickets be editable by their authors after the fact would be very helpful. This would have to be auditable, of course. In addition, allow users to upvote specific tickets would help to prioritize desired features, pressing bugs, or other tickets wherein there is a shared desire for work from the userbase.
|
|
- [ ] **"Community" navigation group** - A "Community" nav group in the sidebar with subpages like "Contacts (NPCs)", "Statistics", etc., would be really helpful for future updates wherein the players will have interactions with NPCs via the market, in general conversation, long-standing faction interactions, etc.
|
|
|
|
## Desirable Additions, Medium Priority
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **"First obtained by" label for items** - When adding an item to the arsenal for the first time, there should be a tag or some type of text to recognize who acquired it/put it into the arsenal/resource pool for the first time. For example, if someone was the first to add a cigarette to the arsenal, in this web app it'll list who that was.
|